Written for lecturers, political advisors and students of economics and fiscal policy about the principles of proportionality of state intervention and modern monetary and economic strategies of the European Union. Explore causes and effects of European financial crisis decisions, various market intervention options for EU governments and potential strategies for economic growth.
The main theories of state intervention and the Principles of Proportionality and Subsidiarity are critically appraised in this chapter. Neofunctionalism, intergovernmentalism and postfunctionalism are the three theories of state intervention discussed, followed by an overview of the nature of state intervention in planned and free market economies. The EU is described as a liberal free market based on neoliberalism principles, in which capitalism, democracy and liberalism are combined. Neoliberalism is then examined in terms of underlying theories of Public Choice and Rational Choice followed by the concept of proportionality, its theoretical origins, practical application and links to Justice Theory. An overview of EU intervention after the 2007–2008 financial crisis, and its impact on Member States, is presented at the end of this chapter.
Theories of European Integration
State Intervention by EU
Theories Underlying Rise of Neoliberalism
The Concept and Definition of Proportionality, Theoretical Roots and Practical Applications
The Nature of State Intervention in the Post-crisis Developed World
Outline of the Impact of State Intervention After 2008
The major events that occurred in the decades prior to the 2007–2008 crisis are appraised including the emergence of securitisation, substantial changes in regulation that created freer financial markets and high market liquidity. The impact of the crisis which resulted from these changes is evaluated in relation to its severe financial effects on the banking sector in US and EU countries, the social effect of public loss of trust and new EU legislation to prevent taxpayers being responsible for bailing out Member States’ failing banks. The last two sections of this chapter evaluate the severity of the crisis generally, and in relation to specific groups of EU Member States, Northern Europe, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain (PIIGS), and Eastern Europe.
Events Leading to the 2007 Global Recession
Consequences of the Crisis
Crisis Severity
The Crisis in Different European Countries
The opening part of this chapter identifies and discusses the main methods that governments employ to intervene in markets: monetary and fiscal policies and intervention in banks. The role of the Principles of Proportionality and Subsidiarity in the manner that EU intervenes in markets is appraised prior to a review of the details of its intervention by application of the three principal methods. Monetary and fiscal policies are discussed in respect to the 17 Member States comprising the Eurozone, which were the EU’s major concern after the 2007–2008 crisis, and monetary policy impacting on all 27 Member States, which relies on European Central Bank (ECB) coordination with national central banks. Fiscal discipline was regarded as more important in Eurozone countries that were subjected to introduction of a range of standard interventions in an attempt to meet specific debt-level criteria imposed by EU.
Options for Government Intervention
EU Government Intervention
EU Government Intervention in the Market
There are two parts to this chapter: the major EU responses to the 2007–2008 crisis and the diverse effects they had on major Eurozone Member States. The main EU responses appraised are financial reforms, financial stabilisation, enhancing economic governance, funding relating to these measures and interventions to generate economic growth. Identical responses were imposed on all Eurozone members with varying degrees of success, as illustrated by two severe crises in Greece and in Italy. Fundamental differences between the UK and the EU on some policies are discussed as these were instrumental in initiating a referendum on EU membership and the decision by the British electorate to exit.
Overview of EU Response to the 2007–2008 Crisis
The Major Eurozone Crises 2015 to 2018: Case Studies Greece, Italy and UK
Italy
The UK: Brexit
The EU Recovery Plan and the drivers for growth in the EU Single Market for the period from 2008 onwards are the most important subjects appraised in this chapter. The EU Recovery Plan is critically evaluated in respect to regenerating economic growth, and especially related to job creation for under 25-year-olds, which was required owing to the high percentage of youth unemployment especially in the Southern European Member States. The monitoring plan is also evaluated including criticism of its perceived lack of effectiveness by independent experts. The EU Single Market is explored in terms of the stated drivers for growth, the investment plan to accomplish these goals and a specific strategy to enable economic growth in Greece as it received its third bailout, a reflection of the failure of previous EU intervention.
The Economic Recovery Plan
The EU Single Market
This final part of the original research summarises the main findings and draws conclusions regarding the proportionality of EU intervention in Member States after 2007–2008 including quantifying them from publicly available data. The effects of intervention on unemployment and economic growth are summarised, and found to have had a varied impact across the Members States, with Southern European countries being more negatively affected than northern nations. The influence of austerity measures is evaluated employing evidence from diverse sources, and the EU intervention of a single policy for the economic recovery of all Member States is found to be flawed. The reluctance of EU to consider advice from outside its own advisers, an inability to learn, is identified as a reason for its failure to implement suitable interventions to support reviving the economies of all Eurozone Member States, rather than just those with low initial deficits. The final section demonstrates that the Principle of Proportionality had not been applied appropriately during this period as demonstrated, for instance, by the substantial divergence in the social and economic consequences of EU interventions in Member States and the dominant influence of Germany on EU policy and changes to legislation. The major spillover effects on Eurozone and non-Eurozone members are also summarised.
Overview of the Effects of State Intervention on Employment and Growth
Intervention Austerity Measures, Problems and Effects
Principle of Proportionality
Spillover Effects of EU Policies
This chapter compares the economic, social and political development in three of the original EEC Member States from their initial membership until mid-2020. Three case studies undertaken in Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom explore the history prior to 2008, the EU interventions in the post financial crisis period and their consequences on national social and economic trends. Since these three Member States were among the founding members of the EEC, but have experienced diverse experiences and outcomes from the same EU policies, the potential reasons for the difference are explored. The findings from surveys conducted in each of those countries are presented in terms of how aptly the Principles of Proportionality and Subsidiary have been applied in each case. A short epilogue outlines the current situation reinforcing Germany’s continued influence on EU policy and demonstrating the lack of solidarity among EU nations during the Coronavirus pandemic, and the EU response to it.
Case Study 1: United Kingdom
Case Study 2: Germany
Case Study 3: Italy
Case Study Limitations and Outcome
Muhammad Ali Nasir
Associate Professor in Economics at the University of Leeds and a Visiting Research Fellow at the University of Cambridge. He is the author of 'Off the Target: The Stagnating Political Economy of Europe and Post-Pandemic Recovery'.
Michael Hauer, Professor for Financial Markets and Financial Planning
at the ebs European Business School, Oestrich-Winkel and at the Amberg-Weiden University of Applied Sciences.
Wyndham Hacket Pain, Senior Editor, Palgrave Macmillan
The Proportionality of State Intervention
Dr. Günther Horzetzky, State Secretary at the German Ministry of Economic Affairs, Energy, Industry, SMEs and Crafts
Fundraising to Combat Hunger Crises